Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE) A Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare thoroughly for the SANE Examination with questions designed to enhance your comprehension. Each question is complemented by hints and explanations to boost your confidence. Ace your exam!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


What is causation in the context of negligence?

  1. The ability to see injury before it occurs

  2. The proximate cause, which is difficult to prove

  3. The actions taken after an injury occurs

  4. A legal concept that does not relate to harm

The correct answer is: The proximate cause, which is difficult to prove

Causation in the context of negligence refers specifically to the relationship between a party's actions and the resulting injuries or damages that occur. The correct answer highlights the concept of proximate cause, which establishes a direct link between the negligent act and the harm suffered by the plaintiff. In legal terms, proximate cause is the primary cause that sets in motion a sequence of events leading to the injury. It is often considered difficult to prove because it requires demonstrating that the harm was a foreseeable result of the negligent conduct. In negligence cases, it is not enough to show that a duty of care was breached; it must also be shown that this breach directly caused the injuries claimed. The specifics of how causation is established can involve complex legal principles and factual analysis, making it a crucial but challenging element to substantiate in court. Understanding the nuances of proximate cause can significantly influence the outcome of negligence claims, as it addresses whether the injury was a direct result of the negligent actions rather than an unrelated incident or intervening cause.